The Effectiveness of Guselkumab in Patients With Hidradenitis Suppurativa Under Clinical Practice Conditions: A Spanish Multicentre Retrospective Study / fectividad de guselkumab en pacientes con hidradenitis supurativa en condiciones de práctica clínica: estudio retrospectivo y multicéntrico en España

Background Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic skin condition causing lesions in which high levels of interleukin (IL)-23 and T-helper 17 cells are found. Adalimumab remains the only approved treatment. Guselkumab, an antibody targeting the p19 protein subunit of extracellular IL-23, is approved for the treatment of moderate–severe psoriasis, but evidence on its efficacy in treating HS is limited.Objectives To assess the effectiveness and safety of guselkumab in treating moderate–severe HS under clinical practice conditions. Methods A multicentre retrospective observational study was carried out in 13 Spanish Hospitals including adult HS patients treated with guselkumab within a compassionate use programme (March 2020–March 2022). Data referred to patient demographic and clinical characteristics at treatment initiation (baseline), patient-reported outcomes (Numerical Pain Rating Scale [NPRS] and Dermatology Life Quality Index [DLQI]), physician scores (International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System [IHS4], HS Physical Global Score [HS-PGA] and Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response [HiSCR]) were recorded at baseline and at 16, 24, and 48 weeks of treatment. Results A total of 69 patients were included. Most (84.10%) had severe HS (Hurley III) and had been diagnosed for over ten years (58.80%). The patients had been subjected to multiple non-biological (mean 3.56) or biological (mean 1.78) therapies, and almost 90% of those treated with biologics had received adalimumab (AU)

Antecedentes La hidradenitis supurativa (HS) es una situación cutánea crónica que causa lesiones en las que se encuentran altos niveles de interleucina (IL)-23 y células TH-17 colaboradoras, siendo adalimumab el único tratamiento aprobado. Guselkumab, un anticuerpo que focaliza la subunidad de la proteína p19 de IL-23 extracelular, ha sido aprobado para tratar la psoriasis de moderada a severa, siendo limitada la evidencia sobre su eficacia en el tratamiento de la HS. Objetivos Evaluar la efectividad y seguridad de guselkumab para el tratamiento de la HS de moderada a severa, en condiciones de práctica clínica. Métodos Se llevó a cabo un estudio observacional retrospectivo y multicéntrico en 13 hospitales españoles, que incluyó pacientes adultos de HS tratados con guselkumab, dentro de un programa de uso compasivo (de marzo de 2020 a marzo de 2022). Se registraron al inicio y a las 16, 24 y 48 semanas de tratamiento los datos referentes a las características demográficas y clínicas de los pacientes, los resultados reportados por el paciente (Numerical Pain Rating Scale [NPRS] y Dermatology Life Quality Index [DLQI]), puntuaciones del facultativo (International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System [IHS4], HS Physical Global Score [HS-PGA] e Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response [HiSCR]). Resultados Se incluyó un total de 69 pacientes, de los cuales la mayoría (84,10%) tenían HS severa (Hurley III) y habían sido diagnosticados hacía más de 10 años (58,80%). Dichos pacientes habían sido sometidos a múltiples terapias no biológicas (media 3,56) o biológicas (media 1,78), y casi el 90% de los tratados con biológicos habían recibido adalimumab. Se observó una reducción significativa de las puntuaciones IHS4, HS-PGA, NPRS y DLQI desde el inicio hasta las 48 semanas del tratamiento con guselkumab (total p<0,01). Se logró HiSCR en el 58,33% y el 56,52% de los pacientes, a las 16 y 24 semanas, respectivamente (AU)

[Artículo traducido] Efectividad de guselkumab en pacientes con hidradenitis supurativa en condiciones de práctica clínica: estudio retrospectivo y multicéntrico en España / The Effectiveness of Guselkumab in Patients With Hidradenitis Suppurativa Under Clinical Practice Conditions: A Spanish Multicentre Retrospective Study

Antecedentes La hidradenitis supurativa (HS) es una situación cutánea crónica que causa lesiones en las que se encuentran altos niveles de interleucina (IL)-23 y células TH-17 colaboradoras, siendo adalimumab el único tratamiento aprobado. Guselkumab, un anticuerpo que focaliza la subunidad de la proteína p19 de IL-23 extracelular, ha sido aprobado para tratar la psoriasis de moderada a severa, siendo limitada la evidencia sobre su eficacia en el tratamiento de la HS. Objetivos Evaluar la efectividad y seguridad de guselkumab para el tratamiento de la HS de moderada a severa, en condiciones de práctica clínica. Métodos Se llevó a cabo un estudio observacional retrospectivo y multicéntrico en 13 hospitales españoles, que incluyó pacientes adultos de HS tratados con guselkumab, dentro de un programa de uso compasivo (de marzo de 2020 a marzo de 2022). Se registraron al inicio y a las 16, 24 y 48 semanas de tratamiento los datos referentes a las características demográficas y clínicas de los pacientes, los resultados reportados por el paciente (Numerical Pain Rating Scale [NPRS] y Dermatology Life Quality Index [DLQI]), puntuaciones del facultativo (International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System [IHS4], HS Physical Global Score [HS-PGA] e Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response [HiSCR]). Resultados Se incluyó un total de 69 pacientes, de los cuales la mayoría (84,10%) tenían HS severa (Hurley III) y habían sido diagnosticados hacía más de 10 años (58,80%). Dichos pacientes habían sido sometidos a múltiples terapias no biológicas (media 3,56) o biológicas (media 1,78), y casi el 90% de los tratados con biológicos habían recibido adalimumab. Se observó una reducción significativa de las puntuaciones IHS4, HS-PGA, NPRS y DLQI desde el inicio hasta las 48 semanas del tratamiento con guselkumab (total p<0,01). Se logró HiSCR en el 58,33% y el 56,52% de los pacientes, a las 16 y 24 semanas, respectivamente (AU)

Background Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic skin condition causing lesions in which high levels of interleukin (IL)-23 and T-helper 17 cells are found. Adalimumab remains the only approved treatment. Guselkumab, an antibody targeting the p19 protein subunit of extracellular IL-23, is approved for the treatment of moderate–severe psoriasis, but evidence on its efficacy in treating HS is limited.Objectives To assess the effectiveness and safety of guselkumab in treating moderate–severe HS under clinical practice conditions. Methods A multicentre retrospective observational study was carried out in 13 Spanish Hospitals including adult HS patients treated with guselkumab within a compassionate use programme (March 2020–March 2022). Data referred to patient demographic and clinical characteristics at treatment initiation (baseline), patient-reported outcomes (Numerical Pain Rating Scale [NPRS] and Dermatology Life Quality Index [DLQI]), physician scores (International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System [IHS4], HS Physical Global Score [HS-PGA] and Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response [HiSCR]) were recorded at baseline and at 16, 24, and 48 weeks of treatment. Results A total of 69 patients were included. Most (84.10%) had severe HS (Hurley III) and had been diagnosed for over ten years (58.80%). The patients had been subjected to multiple non-biological (mean 3.56) or biological (mean 1.78) therapies, and almost 90% of those treated with biologics had received adalimumab (AU)

The Effectiveness of Guselkumab in Patients With Hidradenitis Suppurativa Under Clinical Practice Conditions: A Spanish Multicentre Retrospective Study. / [Artículo traducido] Efectividad de guselkumab en pacientes con hidradenitis supurativa en condiciones de práctica clínica: estudio retrospectivo y multicéntrico en España.

BACKGROUND: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic skin condition causing lesions in which high levels of interleukin (IL)-23 and T-helper17 cells are found. Adalimumab remains the only approved treatment. Guselkumab, an antibody targeting the p19 protein subunit of extracellular IL-23, is approved for the treatment of moderate-severe psoriasis, but evidence on its efficacy in treating HS is limited. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness and safety of guselkumab in treating moderate-severe HS under clinical practice conditions. METHODS: A multicentre retrospective observational study was carried out in 13 Spanish hospitals including adult HS patients treated with guselkumab within a compassionate use programme (March 2020-March 2022). Data referred to patient demographic and clinical characteristics at treatment initiation (baseline), patient-reported outcomes (Numerical Pain Rating Scale [NPRS] and Dermatology Life Quality Index [DLQI]), physician scores (International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System [IHS4], HS Physical Global Score [HS-PGA] and Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response [HiSCR]) were recorded at baseline and at 16, 24, and 48weeks of treatment. RESULTS: A total of 69 patients were included. Most (84.10%) had severe HS (HurleyIII) and had been diagnosed for over ten years (58.80%). The patients had been subjected to multiple non-biological (mean: 3.56) or biological (mean: 1.78) therapies, and almost 90% of those treated with biologics had received adalimumab. A significant decrease in IHS4, HS-PGA, NPRS, and DLQI scores was observed from baseline to 48weeks of guselkumab treatment (all P<.01). HiSCR was achieved in 58.33% and 56.52% of the patients at 16 and 24weeks, respectively. Overall, 16 patients discontinued treatment, mostly due to inefficacy (n=7) or loss of efficacy (n=3). No serious adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that guselkumab may be a safe and effective therapeutic alternative for patients with severe HS that fail to respond to other biologics.

The Effectiveness of Guselkumab in Patients With Hidradenitis Suppurativa Under Clinical Practice Conditions: A Spanish Multicentre Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic skin condition causing lesions in which high levels of interleukin (IL)-23 and T-helper 17 cells are found. Adalimumab remains the only approved treatment. Guselkumab, an antibody targeting the p19 protein subunit of extracellular IL-23, is approved for the treatment of moderate-severe psoriasis, but evidence on its efficacy in treating HS is limited. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness and safety of guselkumab in treating moderate-severe HS under clinical practice conditions. METHODS: A multicentre retrospective observational study was carried out in 13 Spanish Hospitals including adult HS patients treated with guselkumab within a compassionate use programme (March 2020-March 2022). Data referred to patient demographic and clinical characteristics at treatment initiation (baseline), patient-reported outcomes (Numerical Pain Rating Scale [NPRS] and Dermatology Life Quality Index [DLQI]), physician scores (International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System [IHS4], HS Physical Global Score [HS-PGA] and Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response [HiSCR]) were recorded at baseline and at 16, 24, and 48 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: A total of 69 patients were included. Most (84.10%) had severe HS (Hurley III) and had been diagnosed for over ten years (58.80%). The patients had been subjected to multiple non-biological (mean 3.56) or biological (mean 1.78) therapies, and almost 90% of those treated with biologics had received adalimumab. A significant decrease in IHS4, HS-PGA, NPRS, and DLQI scores was observed from baseline to 48 weeks of guselkumab treatment (all p<0.01). HiSCR was achieved in 58.33% and 56.52% of the patients at 16 and 24 weeks, respectively. Overall, 16 patients discontinued treatment, mostly due to inefficacy (n=7) or loss of efficacy (n=3). No serious adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that guselkumab may be a safe and effective therapeutic alternative for patients with severe HS that fail to respond to other biologics.

Artificial Intelligence in Dermatology: A Threat or an Opportunity? / Inteligencia artificial en dermatología: ¿amenaza u oportunidad?

The worldwide explosion of interest in artificial intelligence (AI) has created a before-and-after moment in our lives by generating great improvements in such sectors as the automotive and food production industries. AI has even been called the fourth industrial revolution. Machine learning through AI is helping to improve professional processes and promises to transform the health care sector as we know it in various ways: 1) through applications able to promote health in the general population by providing high-quality information and offering advice for different segments of the population based on prediction models; 2) by developing prediction models based on anonymized clinical data, for preventive purposes in primary care; 3) by analyzing images to provide additional decision-making support for health care providers, for improving specialist care at the secondary level; and 4) through robotics applied to processes that promote health and well-being. However, the medical profession harbors doubts about whether this revolution is a threat or an opportunity owing to a lack of understanding of AI technology and the methods used to validate its applications. This article outlines basic aspects of AI as it is applied in dermatology and reviews the main advances achieved in the last 5 years.

Inteligencia artificial en dermatología: ¿amenaza u oportunidad? / Artificial Intelligence in Dermatology: A Threat or an Opportunity?

La irrupción de la inteligencia artificial (IA) a nivel mundial ha supuesto un antes y un después en nuestras vidas, generando grandes mejoras en diferentes sectores, como el de la automoción y el agroalimentario, entre otros, lo que ha llevado a denominarla la cuarta revolución industrial. La AI, capaz de aprender de forma automatizada y de ayudar al profesional a mejorar sus procesos, promete cambiar el ámbito sanitario tal y como lo conocemos mediante: 1) aplicaciones capaces de generar salud en la población general a partir del uso de información de calidad y de segmentación de consejos basados en modelos de predicción; 2) modelos capaces de generar algoritmos de predicción a partir de datos anonimizados procedentes de información clínica, a fin de mejorar la prevención primaria; 3) sistemas de análisis de imagen capaces de dar a los profesionales de la salud un soporte extra en la toma de decisiones, mejorando la prevención secundaria; y 4) aplicación de robótica combinada en la mejora de procesos ligados al ámbito de salud y bienestar. Sin embargo, la falta de conocimiento tanto en este tipo de tecnología, como en los términos y la metodología de validación de la misma, hace que la clase médica dude en si esta revolución supone una amenaza o una oportunidad para la profesión. En el presente artículo de revisión pretendemos introducir una serie de aspectos básicos de la IA aplicada a la dermatología, así como los principales avances sucedidos en este campo en los últimos 5 años (AU)

The worldwide explosion of interest in artificial intelligence (AI) has created a before-and-after moment in our lives by generating great improvements in such sectors as the automotive and food production industries. AI has even been called the fourth industrial revolution. Machine learning through AI is helping to improve professional processes and promises to transform the health care sector as we know it in various ways: 1) through applications able to promote health in the general population by providing high-quality information and offering advice for different segments of the population based on prediction models; 2) by developing prediction models based on anonymized clinical data, for preventive purposes in primary care; 3) by analyzing images to provide additional decision-making support for health care providers, for improving specialist care at the secondary level; and 4) through robotics applied to processes that promote health and well-being. However, the medical profession harbors doubts about whether this revolution is a threat or an opportunity owing to a lack of understanding of AI technology and the methods used to validate its applications. This article outlines basic aspects of AI as it is applied in dermatology and reviews the main advances achieved in the last 5 years (AU)

[Translated article] Artificial intelligence in dermatology: A threat or an opportunity? / Inteligencia artificial en dermatología: ¿amenaza u oportunidad?

The worldwide explosion of interest in artificial intelligence (AI) has created a before-and-after moment in our lives by generating great improvements in such sectors as the automotive and food production industries. AI has even been called the fourth industrial revolution. Machine learning through AI is helping to improve professional processes and promises to transform the health care sector as we know it in various ways: 1) through applications able to promote health in the general population by providing high-quality information and offering advice for different segments of the population based on prediction models; 2) by developing prediction models based on anonymized clinical data, for preventive purposes in primary care; 3) by analyzing images to provide additional decision-making support for health care providers, for improving specialist care at the secondary level; and 4) through robotics applied to processes that promote health and well-being. However, the medical profession harbors doubts about whether this revolution is a threat or an opportunity owing to a lack of understanding of AI technology and the methods used to validate its applications. This article outlines basic aspects of AI as it is applied in dermatology and reviews the main advances achieved in the last 5 years (AU)

La irrupción de la inteligencia artificial (IA) a nivel mundial ha supuesto un antes y un después en nuestras vidas, generando grandes mejoras en diferentes sectores, como el de la automoción y el agroalimentario, entre otros, lo que ha llevado a denominarla la cuarta revolución industrial. La AI, capaz de aprender de forma automatizada y de ayudar al profesional a mejorar sus procesos, promete cambiar el ámbito sanitario tal y como lo conocemos mediante: 1) aplicaciones capaces de generar salud en la población general a partir del uso de información de calidad y de segmentación de consejos basados en modelos de predicción; 2) modelos capaces de generar algoritmos de predicción a partir de datos anonimizados procedentes de información clínica, a fin de mejorar la prevención primaria; 3) sistemas de análisis de imagen capaces de dar a los profesionales de la salud un soporte extra en la toma de decisiones, mejorando la prevención secundaria; y 4) aplicación de robótica combinada en la mejora de procesos ligados al ámbito de salud y bienestar. Sin embargo, la falta de conocimiento tanto en este tipo de tecnología, como en los términos y la metodología de validación de la misma, hace que la clase médica dude en si esta revolución supone una amenaza o una oportunidad para la profesión. En el presente artículo de revisión pretendemos introducir una serie de aspectos básicos de la IA aplicada a la dermatología, así como los principales avances sucedidos en este campo en los últimos 5 años (AU)

Punción aspiración con aguja fina y biopsia con aguja gruesa ecoguiada en dermatología: un paso adelante / Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology and Core-Needle Biopsy in Dermatology: A Step Forward

No disponible

Protuberancia occipital externa tipo 3 (en espina o espolón): diagnóstico ecográfico de una causa infrecuente de pseudotumor subcutáneo del cuero cabelludo en adolescentes / Type 3 External Occipital Protuberance (Spine Type): Ultrasonographic Diagnosis of an Uncommon Cause of Subcutaneous Scalp Pseudotumor in Adolescents

No disponible

Repercusión diagnóstica y terapéutica del estudio ecográfico en los trayectos fistulosos perianales en pacientes con sospecha de hidradenitis supurativa / Diagnostic and Therapeutic Implications of Ultrasound Imaging of Perianal Fistulous Tracts in Patients with Suspected Hidradenitis Suppurativa

No disponible

Modelos de práctica de la teledermatología en España. Estudio longitudinal 2009-2014 / Practice Models in Teledermatology in Spain: Longitudinal Study, 2009-2014

INTRODUCCIÓN: La teledermatología (TD) es la especialidad clínica más desarrollada de la telemedicina. El desarrollo de la TD en un país completo no se ha estudiado previamente en profundidad. MÉTODOS: El objetivo fue analizar los modelos de TD en práctica real en España, centrándose en la organización, los aspectos técnicos, la docencia y las ventajas/desventajas percibidas por los teledermatólogos. Se realizaron 2 encuestas con teledermatólogos en 2009 y 2014. RESULTADOS: Se identificaron 25 centros utilizando TD en 2009 y 70 en 2014. La encuesta ampliada fue completada por 21 centros en 2009 y 42 en 2014. Las características generales en 2014 fueron: TD almacenamiento (TDA) fue la técnica predominante (83%), solo el 12% TD en tiempo real y el 5% TD híbrida. El 75% de los pacientes vistos en TD viven a menos de 25 km (TD urbana). La mayoría de los centros utilizan cámaras bridge de gama media y solo el 12% utiliza los teléfonos móviles. El 15% practica teledermoscopia y el 15% TD terciaria. En el 25%, la TD se restringió a la oncología cutánea; el 66% utiliza la TD para formación de médicos de primaria. Las ventajas principales (puntuación 0-10) fueron priorización en oncología (8,3), asistencia rápida de urgencias (7,8), la formación y la comunicación con los médicos de primaria (7,6), el cribado de enfermedad banal (7,6) y la disminución de las visitas presenciales (7,6). Los principales inconvenientes fueron (puntuación 0-10): la baja calidad de imágenes (6,3), el miedo al error (5,7), difícil coordinación con los médicos de primaria (MP) (3,8) y consumo de tiempo (3,3). La evolución 2009-2014 mostró más centros con TD y más teledermatólogos, mejor tecnología y aumento de los modelos TDA y urbano. CONCLUSIÓN: La TD es una tecnología emergente que comienza su fase de consolidación en España. Más del 25% de los centros de dermatología en España han puesto en práctica un sistema de TD. El modelo predominante es TDA en un entorno urbano. Los dermatólogos perciben la TD como una opción efectiva con más ventajas que desventajas. La satisfacción general es alta, sin embargo, todavía hay áreas que necesitan mejoras significativas

INTRODUCTION: Teledermatology is the most advanced clinical specialty in telemedicine. The development of teledermatology in specific countries has not been studied in depth. METHODS: Our objective was to analyze teledermatology models in clinical practice in Spain. We paid special attention to organization, technical aspects, training, and the advantages/disadvantages as seen by teledermatologists. Two surveys were carried out (2009 and 2014). RESULTS: Teledermatology was used at 25 centers in 2009 and at 70 in 2014. The extended survey was completed by 21 centers in 2009 and 41 in 2014. Store-and-forward teledermatology was the main technique (83%) in 2014. Only 12% of centers used the real-time method, and 5% used a hybrid modality. Patients lived less than 25 km away in 75% of cases (urban teledermatology). Most centers used mid-range bridge cameras; only 12% used mobile phones. Teledermoscopy and tertiary teledermatology were each used in 15% of centers. Teledermatology was restricted to skin cancer in 25% of cases, and 66% of centers used it to train primary care physicians. The main advantages, assessed on a scale of 1 to 10, were prioritization in cancer screening (8.3), rapid emergency care (7.8), training of and communication with primary care physicians (7.6), screening for trivial conditions (7.6), and reduction in the number of face-to-face visits (7.6). The main disadvantages were poor image quality (6.3), fear of error (5.7), difficulty in coordinating with primary care physicians (3.8), and time commitment (3.3). Between 2009 and 2014, the number of centers using teledermatology and the number of teledermatologists increased, as did use of the store-and-forward and urban models. The technology used also improved. CONCLUSION: Teledermatology is an emerging technology that is becoming well established in Spain. More than 25% of dermatology centers in Spain have implemented a teledermatology model. Store-and-forward in an urban setting is the most widely used modality. Teledermatologists see this technology as an effective option with more advantages than disadvantages. General satisfaction is high, although there is room for significant improvement in some areas

Practice Models in Teledermatology in Spain: Longitudinal Study, 2009-2014. / Modelos de práctica de la teledermatología en España. Estudio longitudinal 2009-2014.

INTRODUCTION: Teledermatology is the most advanced clinical specialty in telemedicine. The development of teledermatology in specific countries has not been studied in depth. METHODS: Our objective was to analyze teledermatology models in clinical practice in Spain. We paid special attention to organization, technical aspects, training, and the advantages/disadvantages as seen by teledermatologists. Two surveys were carried out (2009 and 2014). RESULTS: Teledermatology was used at 25 centers in 2009 and at 70 in 2014. The extended survey was completed by 21 centers in 2009 and 41 in 2014. Store-and-forward teledermatology was the main technique (83%) in 2014. Only 12% of centers used the real-time method, and 5% used a hybrid modality. Patients lived less than 25km away in 75% of cases (urban teledermatology). Most centers used mid-range bridge cameras; only 12% used mobile phones. Teledermoscopy and tertiary teledermatology were each used in 15% of centers. Teledermatology was restricted to skin cancer in 25% of cases, and 66% of centers used it to train primary care physicians. The main advantages, assessed on a scale of 1 to 10, were prioritization in cancer screening (8.3), rapid emergency care (7.8), training of and communication with primary care physicians (7.6), screening for trivial conditions (7.6), and reduction in the number of face-to-face visits (7.6). The main disadvantages were poor image quality (6.3), fear of error (5.7), difficulty in coordinating with primary care physicians (3.8), and time commitment (3.3). Between 2009 and 2014, the number of centers using teledermatology and the number of teledermatologists increased, as did use of the store-and-forward and urban models. The technology used also improved. CONCLUSION: Teledermatology is an emerging technology that is becoming well established in Spain. More than 25% of dermatology centers in Spain have implemented a teledermatology model. Store-and-forward in an urban setting is the most widely used modality. Teledermatologists see this technology as an effective option with more advantages than disadvantages. General satisfaction is high, although there is room for significant improvement in some areas.

Ampliando el espectro ecográfico de las anomalías vasculares / Broadening the Sonographic Spectrum of Vascular Anomalies

No disponible